Canada Train Blast: 13 Dead, About 40 Missing
Two days ago in Quebec, Canada, a train of seventy-three tanker cars
transporting crude oil derailed into the town of Lac-Meganic. At least five of the cars exploded,
destroying thirty buildings and injuring hundreds of citizens. When the site
was cleared enough for investigators to go searching for bodies over the
weekend, a total of thirteen dead bodies were found and forty were recorded
missing. While some suspected an intentional criminal act, the train's owners
believed the brakes were at fault.
When
the train’s owners claimed that the most likely reason of the incident was brake
failure, many people were angered by such a claim. Such emotions are not
unreasonable considering the emphasis businesses are expected to put on safety regulations.
Losing friends and family in an event that could have been prevented with a
little more care is only obvious to incite anger and disbelief to those, who
were also forced out of their homes for the same reason.
Railroad
use for oil transportation has increased in both Canada
and America,
raising the question of the safety of this transportation system. Following
this Quebec incident, which is the fourth
freight train accident to happen in Canada
this year alone, many have proposed the idea of an oil pipeline running from Canada across the United States as a safer way of
transportation. Lafontaine, who lost three of his family members in this
incident, implied that it is, indeed, time for a change by stating "we always wait for until there's a big accident to change things... well, today we've had a big accident, it's one of the biggest ever in Canada." Unfortunately, the possibility of change, as claimed by Lafontaine and seen through both historical and current events, can still only be suggested in the aftermath of such incidents, affecting the lives of those worldwide.
Article URL
http://www.latimes.com/news/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-canada-derailment-13-dead-20130708,0,5955542.story
I thought you did a good job of summarizing the article and relating a sensitive topic. I can't believe I didn't hear about this massive tragedy until I read your blog. I hope the missing will be found.
ReplyDeleteI did think you could have summarized less and analyzed more.
Final note: this has nothing to do with the actual post, but I adore your blog design.
What do you think of the matter? Do you think it's the criminal activity or a simple brake failure? I think it can be the criminal activity because of so many deaths. The train could have gone the other direction, but instead, it went straight to the town. And I believe that is just one of the reasons why people think it is a criminal activity.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Joanne said about the whole "less summarizing and more analyzing" thing. And what do you think about the whole situation? Could the brakes really be the problem? I think that it could be possible. If it were to be a criminal act, then why let it explode in a busy area? Killing innocent people is not the business.
ReplyDelete